Although our designs have been inspired by nature for millennia, the discipline of bio-inspired design itself is relatively new. We do not have sufficient examples to develop reliable, efficient and effective processes, nor do we have a general theory that links the domains of biology with those of technology (Vincent, Biomimetics: its practice and theory). Although we currently have a surplus of questions, the combined knowledge and expertise of the BID Community can help explore the issues and find answers. Please 'pitch in' using the forums linked to each question!
Bio-inspired design case studies range from materials (Velcro, gecko tape, Lotusan, Mirasol display) to biomechanics-morphology (tidal power, whale power, PAX Streamlining Principle, insect-like locomotion) and processes/systems (Todd's Living Machines, industrial ecology, swarm-based decision making). Recent developments where bio-inspired design shows potential for significant benefits include:
Biological systems typically need to deal with greater variability due to fluctuations in biochemical parameters and reduced control over the environment (compared to engineered systems). A greater understanding of resilience and adaptability in biological systems may help us improve the robustness of our systems.
Some questions for discussion in the Application Areas forum:
Forms in nature can often be directly emulated, although even in this case strict emulation is rarely desirable. Emulating process can be more challenging: although we can learn much from communication and decision making in social insects like honeybees, it does not make sense to emulate the exact details of their dance. The same issues arise when emulating systems: it would not be practical to develop an industrial ecology based on how animals metabolize food or eliminate waste. In addition, it is rarely possible to emulate all aspects of a system, even if we have a good understanding of all the components and their interaction.
Some questions for discussion in the Emulation Levels forum:
The benefits of inter-disciplinary collaboration are clear, but the mechanics can be challenging. Different disciplines have different ways of making sense of the world. Even the terminology can stand in the way. Some questions for discussion in the Bridging Differences forum:
Some questions for discussion in the Inhibitors to Success forum:
Julian Vincent's Royal Society paper Biomimetics: its practice and theory argues that biomimetics lacks a theory which allows for a well-defined, repeated process for transferring knowledge between biological and technology in the sense of determining which subject areas or principles may be successfully applied. On the other hand, bio-inspired design involves analogical reasoning and the construction of cross domain analogies. There is a considerable amount of cognitive science research on how people do this and some hypotheses about the thinking process.
Some questions for discussion in the Theory of BID forum:
Janine Benyus has often talked about 'deep patterns' in nature, typically in the context of the Life's Principles as described in Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature and the revised 2008 'butterfly' version. The Life's Principles appear to be most often used as a qualitative evaluation tool at the end of the design cycle, although the Biomimicry Guild is extending their application to other parts of the design cycle. David Oakey applied the 'diversity' principle in his work on the Entropy carpet tile as described in Biomimicry Case Study - the Story of Entropy (page 7 of the December 2005 Biomimicry Newsletter). The Ecological Performance Standards could be another 'up front' application.
Some questions for discussion in the 'Deep Patterns' and Design forum:
Many argue that nature and sustainability are inseparable, and therefore solutions emulating nature must also be sustainable. The implication is that sustainability is a fitness factor that can be selected for at the organism level. On the other hand, sustainability may be a systems property that cannot be directly predicted based on the attributes of components. Emulating a form process or system in a different context may not carry with it the desired sustainability characteristics, and could even result in undesirable behavior. Controversy over biofuels, particularly (but not limited to) corn-based ethanol, demonstrates the difficulty of predicting results when a process or device is 'translated' from one complex system to another.
Some questions for discussion in the BID and Sustainability forum: